Gallup Strengths in the Leadership Team: Clarify Roles, Resolve Conflicts, Decide Faster

Most Swiss executive boards are staffed with people who have excellent CVs, clear mandates – and a persistent feeling that we discuss too much, decide too slowly and repeat the same debates. The reason is rarely technical. It is that leadership teams rarely make explicit *how* each individual naturally thinks, decides and exerts influence. This is exactly where Gallup CliftonStrengths® in leadership team coaching starts.

Why classic leadership team development often fizzles out

Retreats, personality profiles, 360° feedback – leadership teams are usually over-tested and under-trained. The typical symptoms:

• Politeness instead of friction. Controversial topics get settled bilaterally afterwards instead of being decided in the room.

• Role erosion. Everyone is responsible for everything, nobody has the formal lead for decision preparation, moderation or follow-through.

• Repeated debates. The same discussion (pricing strategy, investment approvals) resurfaces every six to eight weeks – without any decision really holding.

The cause is rarely competence. It is role and pattern blindness: the team does not know its collective thinking and decision patterns.

What CliftonStrengths® does differently at C-level

CliftonStrengths® measures 34 talent themes across four domains (executing, influencing, relationship building, strategic thinking). In a leadership team the result reads differently than in an operational team:

|---|---|---|

A leadership team that knows its domain distribution can deliberately decide against its own bias – instead of repeating it.

The four-phase process for leadership teams

Phase 1 – Individual clarity (2–3 weeks)

Every team member completes the CliftonStrengths® 34 assessment and receives an individual 60-minute debriefing with a Certified Purpose Coach®. Goal: each person can explain their top 10 in their own words and names two or three concrete leadership situations where those themes show up.

Phase 2 – Team strengths matrix (workshop day)

In the one-day workshop we build the collective matrix and analyse:

• Domain distribution: where is the team strong, where does it have structural blind spots?

• Role overlaps: which two or three people unconsciously compete for the same role (for example “idea generator” or “delivery driver”)?

• Underused talents: which strengths does someone bring that the team has not been drawing on?

The output is a role charter for the body – who moderates, who prepares, who asks the critical questions, who secures follow-through.

Phase 3 – Decision case reviews (3 sessions of 90 minutes)

In monthly follow-ups we work on real open decisions: an investment, a personnel question, a market or product call. We apply the role charter and document what gets easier and where old patterns return. Coaching becomes a live operating theatre, not a training room.

Phase 4 – Transfer into the organisation

The leadership team cascades the vocabulary (“Strategic”, “Achiever”, “Communication”) into the second leadership layer. Optionally, strengths-based leadership training follows for the direct reports.

Three typical C-level patterns – and how CliftonStrengths® exposes them

Pattern 1: the strategy-heavy leadership team

Six out of eight people have top themes in strategic thinking. The analyses are brilliant, but implementation cycles take twice as long as the competition's. Intervention: deliberately attach one person with “Achiever” or “Focus” to every strategic decision – not as an assistant, but as an equal role called “decision closure”.

Pattern 2: the harmony-driven leadership tandem

CEO and COO both have Harmony and Connectedness in their top 10. Conflicts get smoothed over, uncomfortable personnel decisions postponed. Intervention: a third person with Command or Analytical is formally mandated as “devil's advocate” in personnel decisions – a role, not a personality.

Pattern 3: the influential but loud body

Three people with Communication and Self-Assurance dominate every meeting. Two people with Deliberative and Intellection deliver the most valuable input – but only 24 hours later by email. Intervention: a structured round before every decision (“two minutes per person, no reactions”) plus written preparation 48 hours in advance.

What research and practice show

Gallup meta-analyses (State of the Global Workplace 2024) show that strengths-based teams are 8 to 18 percent more productive and around 15 percent less prone to turnover than comparable control groups. For leadership teams themselves the data is thinner – Gallup deliberately recommends case-based evaluation instead of aggregated KPIs. In our practice we observe that after the four-phase process leadership teams typically close decisions after one or two meetings instead of four or five (observations from coaching practice, not from a controlled study).

Common objections – and honest answers

“We already did MBTI/Insights/DISC.” Typology models sort people into categories. CliftonStrengths® ranks 34 themes individually – two people of the same “type” still have different orders. For leadership teams that individuality is decisive. Comparison: CliftonStrengths vs. MBTI vs. DISC.

“We don't have four months.” Condensed one-day formats deliver insight, but no behaviour change. The transfer effect happens in phase 3, not in the workshop.

“We are a very rational team.” All the better. CliftonStrengths® is not a psychological tool but a pattern-recognition instrument. Analytical leadership teams tend to respond particularly well because the model is empirically validated (24 million+ data points, published validation studies).

Next step

If you want to check whether Gallup Strengths in leadership team coaching is the right lever for your body, book a free 30-minute consultation. We look together at the current team constellation, open decisions and possible formats – and give an honest assessment of when another instrument (for example ProfilingValues for leaders or the Purpose Leadership Compass format) fits better.

👉 Book Free 30-Min Consultation

Further reading

• CliftonStrengths® in team coaching (operational teams)

• Strengths-based leadership with CliftonStrengths®

• The five dysfunctions of a team by Lencioni

• Psychological safety in teams and leadership